Volume 1, Issue 2 (9-2015)                   FPCEJ 2015, 1(2): 74-84 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zahd Babolan A, Hosseni Shorabeh M, Peri Kamrani M, Dehghan F. Compare marital satisfaction, marital conflict and forgiveness in ordinary couples in divorce. FPCEJ. 2015; 1 (2) :74-84
URL: http://fpcej.ir/article-1-100-en.html
1- Associate Professor at Ardebil University,Ardebil, Iran
2- Master of Family Counseling, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran
3- Ph.D. Student of Consultation, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
4- Master of Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran , fateme.dehghan1368@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2769 Views)

This study compared the marital satisfaction, marital conflict and forgiveness in ordinary couples in divorce. The method of this study, causal - comparative and sample consisted of 75 normal and 75 couples had divorced couple that is the sampling method were selected. The instrument used for data collection questionnaire Sanaee marital conflict, marital satisfaction (Enrich) and interpersonal forgiveness EHTESHAM was born and colleagues. In analyzing the data, the frequency, mean and standard deviation for the results of descriptive and multivariate analysis of variance and t-sample (Manoa) was used for analytical findings. Results: The results showed that the mean total relief t-sample is the significant relationship. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed a significant difference between the two groups is statistically significant is divorce. According to the statistics (001/0> p), thus there where between mean scores of two groups: normal and is divorced couples in marital satisfaction, marital conflict and forgiveness, there are also significant differences in Mvlfh¬ family strength between the ordinary couples in divorce due to the significant level (001/0> p) there are significant differences. Also in the relief components between the normal and the couple are divorcing, according to a significant level (001/0> p) a significant difference was observed. The results showed that normal in terms of marital satisfaction, marital conflict and divorce is the gift of more-more of the components are common in couples greater family stability and relief components of the couple are divorcing is<span dir="RTL" lang="FA" style="line-height: 90%; font-family: " b="" zar";="" font-size:="" 11.5pt;="" mso-ascii-theme-font:="" major-bidi;="" mso-hansi-theme-font:="" mso-no-proof:="" yes;="" mso-ascii-font-family:="" "times="" new="" roman";="" mso-hansi-font-family:="" roman";"="">.

Full-Text [PDF 964 kb]   (2097 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
ePublished: 2016/10/16

References
1. Alemand, M., Amberg, I., Zimprich, D., Fincham, F. D. 2007. The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in epistiodic forgiveness. Journal of Social and clinical Psychology, 26(2): 199- 217.
2. Coi, J., Wat. N., West. S., Hawkins., Asarnow. J., Markman, H., Ramey, S., Shure, M., and Long, B. 1993. The science of prevention: A Conceptual Fromework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychology and Psychiatry. 48: 1013- 1022.
3. Fincham, F. D. 2000. The kiss of the porcupines: from attributing responsibility to forgiving, personal Relationship 7: 1- 23.
4. Fincham, F.D. 2004. Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage, Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 18, N. 1: 72- 81.
5. Fincham, F., Beach, S. 2002. Forgiveness in marriage: Impliations for psychological agnation and constructive communication. Perssonal Relationship, 9: 239- 257.
6. Fincham, F. D., Hall, J., & Beach, S. R. 2006. Forgiveness in Marriage:Current Status and Future Directions- Family Relation Journal, 55: 415- 427.
7. Finchan, F., Paleri, G., Recalia, C. 2002. Forgiveness in marriage: the role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationship, 9: 23- 37.
8. Fincham, F.D. Beach, R. H., Davilla, J. 2004. Loongi. Tudinval. Relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 3: 542- 545.
9. Fowers, B. J. Olson, D. H. 1992. Four types of premarital couples: An empirical typology based on PREPARE. Journal of family psychology, 6, 1, 10- 21.
10. Gordon, K. C, Baucom, D. H & Snyder, D. K, 2009. Victims as “narraitive critis” factors influencing rejoinders and evaluative responses to offender’s acccounts, Personality and Social Psycholoogy Bullitin, 20 (6), 691-704.
11. MacCullough, M. E, Browne, M. W & Sugawara, H. M, 1996. Power Analysis and Determination of SampleSize for Covariance Structure Modeling, Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-49.
12. MacCullough, M. E, Worthington, E. L, Jr & Rachal, K. C, 1997. Interpersonal forgiving in close relationship, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-33
13. MacCullough, M. E, 1998. An annotated bibliography of research on forgiveness and related concepts. Psychological research and theological speculations, Philadelphia: The Templeton Foundation Press.
14. Patrick, S., Sells, J. N., Giordano, F. G. ., Tollerud, T. R. 2007. Intimacy, differentiation, and personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction. The Family Journal, 15: 359- 367.
15. Shachelford, T. K., Besser, A. & Goetz, A. T. 2010. Personality, marital satisfaction, and marital infidelity. Individual Differences Research, 6 ,1, 13- 25.
16. Tersa., Maria., Vinsonneau., Genevieve., Neto., Felix., Girard., Michel., Etienne. 2003. Forgiveness and Satisfaction with life, Journal Of Happiness studies, 4: 323- 335.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb