Volume 1, Issue 2 (9-2015)                   FPCEJ 2015, 1(2): 46-58 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Momeni K, Kavoosi Omid S, Amani R. Predicting marital commitment on the basis of differentiation of self, family adaptability and cohesion, and marital intimacy . FPCEJ. 2015; 1 (2) :46-58
URL: http://fpcej.ir/article-1-98-en.html
1- Associate Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran
2- MSc, Family Counseling, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran , kavosi.s1387@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economic & Social Sciences, Bu-Ali-Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract:   (2634 Views)

This study has been conducted with the aim to predict marital commitment based on differentiation, family’s cohesion and adaptability, and marital intimacy among married women teachers in Hamadan city. In this descriptive correlational research, sample of 346 persons across all married female teachers in Hamadan were selected by multistage random sampling. Participants in the study completed a demographic form, the standard questionnaire of marital commitment (Adams & Jones, 1997), differentiation of self inventory (Skowron & Smith, 2003), flexibility and cohesion evaluation scale-III (Olson et al., 1985) and intimacy scale (Walker & Thompson, 1983). The results of multiple regression analysis showed that among all the predictors, marital intimacy has the biggest role in predicting marital commitment and after that are family cohesion and differentiation. In total, these three variables predict about 62% of the variance of marital commitment. The findings show that the experiences of the early development of the family, the quality of the relationship between mother and child and cohesion of family members, have important effects on couples’ interpersonal relations.

Full-Text [PDF 1123 kb]   (3100 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
ePublished: 2016/10/15

References
1. Adams, J. M. & Joens, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: an integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177-1196.
2. Amato, P. R. (2004). Studying marital interaction and commitment with survey data. journal of Marriage and Family,23, 53-70.
3. Amato, P. R. (2008). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2006. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1-22.
4. Bagarozzi, D. (2001). Enhancing intimacy in marriage. NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
5. Bowen, M. (1978). family therapy in clinical practice. NY. London: Jason Anderson.
6. Cohan, C. L., & Kleinbaum, S. Toward a greater understanding of premarital cohabitation and marital commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2002, 64(1), 180-193
7. Ghafuri, M., Golparvar, M., & Mehdizadegan, I. (2010). Attachment Styles and religious attitudes as success and failure predictors of maritalrelationships. Behaviourial Science Studies,7(2), 143-153.
8. Glad, G. E. (2000). The effect of self differentiation on marital conflict. American Journal of Pastoral Psychology, 65-76.
9. Glenn, G. V. & Krammer, M .G. (1987). Examining individualism, collectivism and differentiation in African American college women. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 1-15.
10. Goodfriend, W. Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans. Personality and social psychology Bulletin,37, 1639-1652.
11. Haws, W. & Mallinckrodt, B. (1998). Separation individuation from family of origin and marital adjustment of recently married couple. AmericanJournal of FamilyTherapy,26(4), 293-307.
12. Heller, P. &. Wood, B. (1998). The of process of intimac. Journal Marital and FamilyTherapy, 24: 273-291.
13. Harris, K. M. & Lee, H .(2007.). The development of marriage expectations, attitudes, desire from adolescence into young adulthood, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill . Department of sociology and the Carolina population center.
14. Jamali motlagh, M. F. (2013). Attachment styles, Differentiation of self and sexual dysfunction as pridictors of marital satisfaction in married women. SwitzerIand research park journa,10(102): 870-884.
15. Jeanfreau, M. M. (2009). a qualitative study investigating the decision making process of women, participation in marital infidelity. kansas stateuniversity.
16. Judy, A. (2006). Understanding the contribution of relative commitment to the link betmeen romantic attachment and jealousy. unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Carolina.
17. Kerr, M. B. Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. NY: Norton.
18. Lingren, H. G. (2003). Creating sustainable families. publishedby cooperative extension Institute of Agriculture andNatural Resources. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Available on: www.ianr.unl.edu/pub.
19. Lucas, R. E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reaction changein maritalstatus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527-539.
20. Maccarthery, B. (1999). Marital style and its effects on sexual desire and functioning. Journal of Family Psycho Therapy, 10, 1-12.
21. Macher, S. (2013). Social interdependence in close relationships: The actor partnerinter dependence–investment model (API-IM. European Journal of Social Psycholog,43, 84-96.
22. Miller, R. A. Anderson, S., Keala, D.K. (2004). Is Bowen theory valid? A review of basic research. Journal of marital and family therapy, 30, 453- 470.
23. Mosko, J. (2009). .Communication and attachment dimension’s in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. Purdue University.
24. Mullise, R. B. Brailsford,J.C. & Mullise,A.K. (2003). Relation between Identity formation and family characteristics young adults. Journal of family Issues. Journal of family Issues,
25. Olson, D. H. Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III. Unpublished manuscript,Family Social Science. University of Minnesota
26. Patrick, S. S. Sells, J. N., Giordano, F. G. & Follerud, T. R. (2007). Intimacy,differentiation. And personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction. The Family Journal, 15, 359-367.
27. Pelage, M. (2008). The relationship between differentiation of self and marital satisfaction:What can be learn from married couple over the course of life? . The Journal of Family Therapy,36, 388-401.
28. Pistol, m. c. lorance, c. v. (1999). Attachment and commitment in collegestudent’s romantic relationships. . Journal of college student development, 40, 6,pg 710.
29. Reynold, J. & Mansfield, P. (1999). The effect of changing attitudes to marriage on its stability. Lord Chancellors department. High divorce rats: the state of the evidence on reasons and remedies, (2), 1-3. Research series, 2/99.
30. Rosen- Garandon, J. R. Myers, J. E. & Hattie, J. A. (2004). The relationship between mental characteristic, marital interaction processes and marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling & Developmen,82, 58-68.
31. Skowron, E. A. (2000). The role of differentiation of self in marital adjustment. Journal of counseling psychology,47, 229-237.
32. Skowron, E. & Dendy , A. K. (2004). Differentiation of self & attachment in adulthood:Relational correlates of effortful control. Contemporary Family Therapy. 26,P 339 .
33. Skowron, E. A. . & Schmitt, T. A. (2003). Assessing interpersonal fusion: Reliability and validity of a new DSI fusion with others subscale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,29, 209-222.
34. Skowron, E. A., Stanley, K., & Shapiro, M. (2009). A longitudinal perspective on differentiation of self, interpersonal, and psychological well-being in youngadulthood. Contemporary Family Therapy,22, 234-244.
35. Walker AJ, Thompson L. (1983). Intimacy andintergenerational aid and contact amongmothers and daughtersy. journal of Marriage AndThe Famil. 45:841-9.
36. Whitson, S., El-Sheikh, M. (2003). Marital conflict and health. Processes and protective factors Aggression and Violent Behavio,8, 283–312.
37. Young, J. K. , Klosko, J., & Weishaar, M. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’sguide. New York: Guildford.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb